Skip to main content

Flight Risk

I’m not a good flier.  Although not aerodynamic, I am referring to my psychological attitude to powered flight; the fad that started at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina with the Wright brothers and will, any day now, disappear from society like the hula hoop and efficient customer service.

I embark on any aeroplane with trepidation. I think of it as a potential fiery tube of death.  A winged cylinder filled in a split second with a vicious orange fireball, the heinous result of a tiny spark, from an ill-maintained circuit, igniting tons of aviation fuel.

People try to help by saying things like, “it’s more dangerous driving on the roads.” I know they have statistics on their side, however, if the engine stops on my Toyota Townace, then I am not 30,000 feet above ground in a machine that the Internet informs me weighs approximately the same as 56 African elephants when fully fuelled. (Yes, the Boeing 747, not the elephants.)

There are no engines, so we glide. We travel pretty far, but the plane is above the Great Australian Bight and as we hit the water it’s like plummeting straight onto concrete. Or worse, some of us survive and the Southern Ocean rushes in pitilessly, smashing the air from the cabin. The last thing I see is the pale yellow light, flickering on my lifejacket.

The trouble is I don’t drink. But I always consider having a drink or two – which is all a teetotaller needs to feel comfortably numb – when I get on a flight, but then I always decide that I need to face the enclosed furnace or the icy ocean depths, fully sober, which, even as I write these words, seems extraordinarily dumb.

When I get on the plane, I do what many other bad fliers do. I mentally detach myself from the experience. I become a consciousness piloting the vessel of my body which is inside a much larger craft that is totally out of my control.  I listen to music. Read magazines. Ignore the food and drink. And generally pretend as though I am not really cramped into one of those Economy Class airliner seats.  You can attempt to talk to me, but you’re only getting my voicemail.

All of this is a mere preamble to my actual point. If all of us who hate flying didn’t have enough reasons to curse the experience, now there’s something else to worry about.  This happened in the United States last Thursday. Apparently, during a JetBlue flight from Newark to Orlando, a centrefold model for Singapore Playboy attempted to open one of the plane’s doors. Tiffany Livingston, 21 is reported to have suffered an anxiety attack when she attempted her mid-flight flit.  Apparently the other 328 passengers experienced their own anxiety attack shortly thereafter.

Tiffany 'Midflight' Livingston

So now, I have to worry about the anxious centrefold model three rows up. (Although, if she’s back in Economy with me, she needs a better manager.)  I would like to end this post with an appeal to any potentially skittish Playboy models boarding planes that I might be on.  Please make sure you down a couple of Mersyndol Forte or whatever elixir you require to help you get through the flight.

Otherwise, if you go anywhere near a door and don’t appear sufficiently cheery, then a pony-tailed Eurasian man slightly drunk on half a can of  UDL gin and tonic, will be spearheading a phalanx of passengers to tackle you to the floor.

And no one wants to see that.

Mr Trivia

Comments

Ashleigh said…
that sucks for you.. flying is boring, but it can be a pretty incredible experience.

your last paragraph i found hilarious...

and thanks for following my blog!

www.onionsblog.blogspot.com
Mr Trivia said…
I may be indulging in a little hyperbole - but not much!

Thanks for your kind words and you know we blggers have to stick together. Only we know how fascinating we truly are.

Cheers!

Popular posts from this blog

What's with George Eads' Hair?

DailyCeleb.com & David Edwards


Hey Zeitgeisters,

Bet you thought this blog would never top “What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?” For those of you who weren’t part of that historical blog entry, it was the glittering moment where I wondered what’s with West Wing star Bradley Whitford’s hair. Good times.

However, tonight, while watching the current series (in Australia) of CSI :Original Recipe, I was forced to witness the unpleasantness of George Eads’ new(ish) 'do and I felt compelled to blog on’t.

George plays the part of Nick Stokes and has spent some 5 or 6 seasons with a haircut “you could set your watch to,” as Grandpa Simpson might say. It was always short; it always had that US Marine Corps vibe; it was always as dependable as the ebbing and flowing of the tides.

Now in something of an El Nino effect, I note that someone in Jerry Bruckheimer’s organization has decided to mess with the length of George’s crowning glory.

Although I chiefly watch CSI waiting for Grissom…

What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?

Okay, Zeitgeisters, that’s as shallow an attention-grabbing start as one could ever want, but I really want to know. And sure, I’m really talking about Josh Lyman’s hair. (I’m like one of those people who insist on calling an actor by their character’s name – only in reverse. e.g. “Go Knight Boat!”)

Whitford plays Deputy Chief of Staff, Josh Lyman, in the Aaron Sorkin-created, NBC television series The West Wing. He plays this part to a tee and now he’s set to do great things in the new Sorkin drama, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. I know this last bit because the Angriest Ex-Video Store Clerk in the world told me.

Oh, and Whitford’s married to the awesome Jane Kaczmarek who plays mom, Lois, in the series Malcolm in the Middle. So Mr Whitford’s your regular pop-cultural icon and yardstick for excellence. We’re here in this, frankly, puzzling cultural landscape, because I’ve just finished watching season four of The West Wing on DVD. And Josh Lyman’s hair has bothered me throughout. It’s…

Institutional Memory

Note: If you’re here, you were connected with Perth’s Film and Television Institute at some point. The FTI in the form that we know it, is being wound up and some of its functions are being taken over by ScreenWest. This is my idiosyncratic tribute to the FTI as it was formerly.
I’m not someone who plans things. Depending on how well you know me, you might be saying “Amen to that” right about now. There was no plan to have anything to do with filmmaking when my friends and I entered our first efforts in the WA Film and Video Festival almost 35 years ago (forerunner of the WASAs). We made experimental films on Super 8 movie film; in-camera editing, falling down sand dunes, raw meat and tomato sauce representing the terrible effects of our filmic violence. Super-8 was the cheapest type of movie film. 8 millimetres in width. You could shoot two-and a-half to three-and-a-half minutes depending on your frames-per-second. We had no money, so shot “longer” at 18 fps. Our tiny epics, like “Mea…