Skip to main content

The Internet is Heaps Fun



Hey Kids! (Of All Ages!)
Run out of fun stuff to do on the Internet this weekend?
Why not check out these boffo sites?

For The People

www.communism.com - has extensive stuff on communism for all those who wanted to know about the subject but were too bourgeois to ask. It gives a scientific definition of communism and contrasts it with what the site calls a “bullshit definition” i.e.:

“Rule of society by a single party which maintains a monopoly of political power and suppresses all opposition. Control of the economy via centralized bureaucratic planning.”
There’s plenty that will annoy and stimulate you in this text-y yet colourful site. There’s an FAQ and a poll, which asks among other questions:
"Is communism a monstrous system of slavery or the
inevitable peaceful and abundant future of humankind?"
For all those missing the feel of a poli-sci debate at an undergraduate level.

For The Folk

www.folkdancing .com - from its plain black text on white background, through to its descriptions of folk dancing, this is the site for those of you craving an American take on traditional European (and especially Scandinavian) folkdance.

When you discover this term, “Norway Parisarpolka classical hardingfele couple” you might be forgiven for thinking – “ah ha, if that’s folk dancing, it’s definitely the horizontal kind”. But no. As it says on the site:

“ This figure dance for couples, with the typical forward and back pattern common to so many Norwegian folk dances (reinlendar and feiar, for example) is the likely ancestor of the "Scandinavian Polka" (or "Seattle Polka," as it is called in the Pacific Northwest) widely danced in many parts of the United States.”
Forget ballroom and line dancing. Folk dancing was where it was and now its where it’s at. Again. For real.

Elevate the Insignificant

Mr Trivia


Comments

Deirdre said…
Hello, Mr Trivia, and thanks for educating we the people.

I looked at that folk dancing site and really want to be where it's at, but there's a problem: I can't read the directions and dance at the same time. Any suggestions? Should I just give up?
Mister Trivia said…
Hello Deidre,

Tough question you've posed. I think there are two answers.

1. Gather a number of folk (two others minimum) and have one shout out the directions while the other two do the dancing. This would be a reinvention of the old square-dance caller role.

2. If there aren't any folk about at the 'mo, paste the directions into 'Word' and use the reading function to go through the directions in that emotionless, electronic HAL 9000 style that is so condusive to getting a groove on.

I hope that is of assistance.

Regards,

Mr Trivia

P.S. Checked out your sites and realised I have been to your blogs before around the time you mentioned the Interrobang post on your blog. Love the idea of Long Quotes by the way! Its anti-pithy, if I can coin a phrase.
Deirdre said…
Word reading function, eh? I don't know. I'd be very impressed and not a little surprised if my computer can read out loud. I think it's at the stage of maybe sounding out the letters, but whole words? Years away.

And I'm afraid the first solution is out too. No folk at the 'mo, no. I was trying to make do with an imaginary partner, but he wouldn't stop yodelling. (I mean, would you believe? Since when do they yodel in Scandinavia? The man was an idiot.)

But thanks for your advice. And thanks for visiting my blog. I keep forgetting to use the interrobang substitute (ie. (!) or (?) )

Popular posts from this blog

What's with George Eads' Hair?

DailyCeleb.com & David Edwards


Hey Zeitgeisters,

Bet you thought this blog would never top “What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?” For those of you who weren’t part of that historical blog entry, it was the glittering moment where I wondered what’s with West Wing star Bradley Whitford’s hair. Good times.

However, tonight, while watching the current series (in Australia) of CSI :Original Recipe, I was forced to witness the unpleasantness of George Eads’ new(ish) 'do and I felt compelled to blog on’t.

George plays the part of Nick Stokes and has spent some 5 or 6 seasons with a haircut “you could set your watch to,” as Grandpa Simpson might say. It was always short; it always had that US Marine Corps vibe; it was always as dependable as the ebbing and flowing of the tides.

Now in something of an El Nino effect, I note that someone in Jerry Bruckheimer’s organization has decided to mess with the length of George’s crowning glory.

Although I chiefly watch CSI waiting for Grissom…

What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?

Okay, Zeitgeisters, that’s as shallow an attention-grabbing start as one could ever want, but I really want to know. And sure, I’m really talking about Josh Lyman’s hair. (I’m like one of those people who insist on calling an actor by their character’s name – only in reverse. e.g. “Go Knight Boat!”)

Whitford plays Deputy Chief of Staff, Josh Lyman, in the Aaron Sorkin-created, NBC television series The West Wing. He plays this part to a tee and now he’s set to do great things in the new Sorkin drama, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. I know this last bit because the Angriest Ex-Video Store Clerk in the world told me.

Oh, and Whitford’s married to the awesome Jane Kaczmarek who plays mom, Lois, in the series Malcolm in the Middle. So Mr Whitford’s your regular pop-cultural icon and yardstick for excellence. We’re here in this, frankly, puzzling cultural landscape, because I’ve just finished watching season four of The West Wing on DVD. And Josh Lyman’s hair has bothered me throughout. It’s…

Institutional Memory

Note: If you’re here, you were connected with Perth’s Film and Television Institute at some point. The FTI in the form that we know it, is being wound up and some of its functions are being taken over by ScreenWest. This is my idiosyncratic tribute to the FTI as it was formerly.
I’m not someone who plans things. Depending on how well you know me, you might be saying “Amen to that” right about now. There was no plan to have anything to do with filmmaking when my friends and I entered our first efforts in the WA Film and Video Festival almost 35 years ago (forerunner of the WASAs). We made experimental films on Super 8 movie film; in-camera editing, falling down sand dunes, raw meat and tomato sauce representing the terrible effects of our filmic violence. Super-8 was the cheapest type of movie film. 8 millimetres in width. You could shoot two-and a-half to three-and-a-half minutes depending on your frames-per-second. We had no money, so shot “longer” at 18 fps. Our tiny epics, like “Mea…