Skip to main content

Crackbook & Marty



Zeitgeisters,

I‘ve admitted to a minor Facebook addiction in these pages. But if anything will cure that, it’s questionable applications like the “Which Hollywood Director Are You” quiz.

The quiz offers a series of not very challenging questions like “What’s Your Scene? – Bars, Sports, Clubs, Outdoors or Music”; after doing 10 vague multip;e choice questions like these, I hit the submit button, only to receive the news that I was 45% like Martin Scorsese. I was mercifully 0% like Steven Spielberg, but if you’d ever met me, you’d know I am actually NOTHING like the director of Taxi Driver, Goodfellas and The Aviator. Scorsese is the fast-talking, enthusiastic movie expert whose visceral, violent flicks have explored the American male psyche for a generation. Me? I enjoy watching the Gilmore Girls.

If I’m like any of the choices on offer in this quiz, then I bear some resemblance to the nerdly Steven Soderbergh. The slack questions lead to a 2% match with this director, so I could tell right there that the whole set-up was screwy. I'm sure Steve is an avid follower of the antics of Rory and Lorelei Gilmore in Stars Hollow.

I meet a number of filmmakers at Media Dell’Arte, where I work, and I think 99% of them would resemble Scorsese, if you asked them the same loosely-worded questions.

As much as I have enjoyed Scorsese’s work previously (Raging Bull would make my Top 10) I am a little disappointed with his latest outing. A short bit of blah called the Key to Reserva (check it out here or here). Basically it’s a commercial for wine done in the style of a Hitchcock film. It is presented as a real ‘behind the scenes’ film showing what Scorsese would do if he found some unfilmed Hitchcock script pages. Parts of it are very well done, but in the end I found it hard not to feel, meh – why’d you bother with this ad, Marty?

Pastiche and or homage always feels like a tremendous waste of energy and resources to me. The Key to Reserva is in a similar category to Baz Luhrmann’s ludicrous (and well-paying) Chanel No.5 commercial with Nicole Kidman. Luhrmann seemed to be pastiching himself in that one and it’s hard to say if that’s better or worse.

For some reason I am not judgemental about Scorsese’s very amusing American Express commercial.

So, providing that I’m entertained, that makes rampant commercialism and hocking one’s name for a product, acceptable, I guess.

Hmm.

Mr Trivia

Comments

hey there, trivi-boy. why didn't you cut the youtube vids into your blog, pal? i had to click on a link and open up new windows and all sorts of stuff. don't you know how fiddly that is? i don't have that kind of time. the lid is coming down real fast, time-waster. plus - you lost a "customer" to youtube. that's like losing a straight scotch drinker to coca cola or something. skill up!
Mr Trivia said…
Edwin,

Your technical expertise is always useful - and this is not the first of these type of advices you have posted in a Mr Triv comments section.

In this case I have no problem embedding a YouTube video. I can do and have done it with my buddies over at monopolymen.com. I choose not to have flashvideo on my blog because I don't like the look and I find the extra download time annoying when I see them on other people's blogs.

I prefer to give people the choice to wander over to YouTube if they wish to check this material out.

So thank you for the exhortation to "skill up", but I'm happy with things the way they are...

Popular posts from this blog

What's with George Eads' Hair?

DailyCeleb.com & David Edwards


Hey Zeitgeisters,

Bet you thought this blog would never top “What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?” For those of you who weren’t part of that historical blog entry, it was the glittering moment where I wondered what’s with West Wing star Bradley Whitford’s hair. Good times.

However, tonight, while watching the current series (in Australia) of CSI :Original Recipe, I was forced to witness the unpleasantness of George Eads’ new(ish) 'do and I felt compelled to blog on’t.

George plays the part of Nick Stokes and has spent some 5 or 6 seasons with a haircut “you could set your watch to,” as Grandpa Simpson might say. It was always short; it always had that US Marine Corps vibe; it was always as dependable as the ebbing and flowing of the tides.

Now in something of an El Nino effect, I note that someone in Jerry Bruckheimer’s organization has decided to mess with the length of George’s crowning glory.

Although I chiefly watch CSI waiting for Grissom…

What’s with Bradley Whitford’s Hair?

Okay, Zeitgeisters, that’s as shallow an attention-grabbing start as one could ever want, but I really want to know. And sure, I’m really talking about Josh Lyman’s hair. (I’m like one of those people who insist on calling an actor by their character’s name – only in reverse. e.g. “Go Knight Boat!”)

Whitford plays Deputy Chief of Staff, Josh Lyman, in the Aaron Sorkin-created, NBC television series The West Wing. He plays this part to a tee and now he’s set to do great things in the new Sorkin drama, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. I know this last bit because the Angriest Ex-Video Store Clerk in the world told me.

Oh, and Whitford’s married to the awesome Jane Kaczmarek who plays mom, Lois, in the series Malcolm in the Middle. So Mr Whitford’s your regular pop-cultural icon and yardstick for excellence. We’re here in this, frankly, puzzling cultural landscape, because I’ve just finished watching season four of The West Wing on DVD. And Josh Lyman’s hair has bothered me throughout. It’s…

Institutional Memory

Note: If you’re here, you were connected with Perth’s Film and Television Institute at some point. The FTI in the form that we know it, is being wound up and some of its functions are being taken over by ScreenWest. This is my idiosyncratic tribute to the FTI as it was formerly.
I’m not someone who plans things. Depending on how well you know me, you might be saying “Amen to that” right about now. There was no plan to have anything to do with filmmaking when my friends and I entered our first efforts in the WA Film and Video Festival almost 35 years ago (forerunner of the WASAs). We made experimental films on Super 8 movie film; in-camera editing, falling down sand dunes, raw meat and tomato sauce representing the terrible effects of our filmic violence. Super-8 was the cheapest type of movie film. 8 millimetres in width. You could shoot two-and a-half to three-and-a-half minutes depending on your frames-per-second. We had no money, so shot “longer” at 18 fps. Our tiny epics, like “Mea…